Saying they are having a hard time offering the necessary courses students need to graduate on time, University of Connecticut officials are considering a 5.8 percent increase in tuition and fees for in-state students next year.
"I've had students crying in my office. We get so much email on a daily basis, and the provost probably gets even more than I get, from students who cannot get the courses they need to graduate," UConn President Susan Herbst said Monday when introducing the increase she is considering to UConn employees and students.
"We've got to boost the number of faculty."
A 5.8 percent increase would get the university 70 new faculty.
The university managed to increase tuition by just 2.5 percent from last year to the current school year, adhering to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's request to not increase tuition more than inflation. But Richard Gray, UConn's budget chief, said that replicating that for a second year would put the system in jeopardy.
"We would begin to deteriorate," he said. Another 2.5 percent increase would only get the university an additional $900,000 for faculty after closing the anticipated multi-million dollar deficit.
Figures show that the university has not kept up with hiring faculty as enrollment skyrocketed. Over the last 15 years, enrollment increased by 53 percent while faculty increased by a modest 16 percent.
"We need to make an investment in faculty," Gray said, pointing to a chart in the auditorium that shows UConn has one of the worst student-to-faculty ratios when compared with peer universities.
Herbst said she also worries that this reality -- that many students cannot get the classes they need -- will begin to affect the university's high rankings.
"Now that we are in the top 20 (according to U.S. News & World Report rankings) ... we want to stay there," Herbst said.
A 5.8 percent increase in tuition and fees for undergraduates translates to a hike of $620 from the current years rate of $11,290. With room and board added, the cost is $22,430, a 4.4 percent increase overall. Gray said this increased tuition could be avoided if the state decided to send UConn more money. For every $1 million, tuition increases could be staved off by 0.2 percent.
But, he said, "We need to not kid ourselves" that increased funding is likely. State officials earlier this year approved a sizable cut in the amount it gives UConn for its operating budget over this year and next to help close the state's deficit.
Any tuition increase will need to be approved by UConn's board of Trustees. A forum on the 5.8 percent option will be held at UConn's Storrs campus Thursday.
A spokeswoman for Gov. Dannel P. Malloy said his office is reviewing all of the options "with an eye on continuing to keep high quality education available and accessible to all students."
Just let Malloy cut the subsidy to UConn by another $100,000,000 and make it clear to Susan Herbst either to manage the campus efficiently or take a hike. The increase in tuition will be less than 20%. The plan is to cut all subsidy ultimately, i.e. within the next four to five years.
The education at UCONN is not worth $22,000. Plain and simple. There is no relationship between the value of an education and what it costs.
We're just putting the next generation of producers deeper in debt. Tuition should go down to make education more affordable to more students. We need more producers not more takers.
I suggest that all supporters of Art Vandelay (as well as other bleeding liberal hearts) should send their charitable donations (if not give up their total assets) to UConn and to other state universities as well as to all other entitlement programs direct;y, instead of the state and federal governments levying taxes indiscriminately on all citizens, to indulge in wasteful schemes. Note that anything that is received freely has no value in the hands of the recipient. Let parents take care of education of their children and let children take care of their parents in their old age. That is
Read MoreTo Realkook: I am no "Bleeding Heart Liberal" not by a long shot. If you've read my blogs I'm more conservative than Rush Limbaugh. My take on this matter is simple. If tuition were lowered more students would be able to afford a higher education and become more productive citizens. What's liberal about that. The more productive citizens we have in our society the less likely they will become wards of the state sucking productive taxpayers dry.
As with our state government there is too much overhead and dead wood in the state university system
Read MoreAnd even with a 6% tuition hike, UConn would the second-cheapest state university in New England, just a few dollars behind the University of Maine -- a difference you would quickly eat up in gasoline.
And those universities aren't even Top 20 like UConn.
The whining and generally ignorant comments on many of these CT Mirror stories is just stunning, BTW. Shouldn't you all be reading The Courant?? Their reader comments are world-class dumb.
realkook -
i dont agree with you often but i do here. UConn is a great institution and i don't think the proposition that the state support it to keep tuition down as a liberal or conservative view. Rather it is the responsible view. Kids are going to struggle to get jobs for a few years and the last thing they need is a boatload of debt. if they want debt they can go to NYU - $55,000, Quinnipiac - $40,000, Yale - $50,000.
but not UConn. the tuition should be frozen at current levels
Read MoreUCONN needs to look at some real efficencies to keep tution down. I agree that more facilty is called for in order to keep up with the growing need for classes. I also support keeping tuition down as compaired with other top-tiered institiutions in the region. But (and there is always a but) college costs nation-wide are escallating as fast as our health care costs. A top-down examination of how UCONN operates, and how it spends needs to be reviewed and cost-containment needs to be pushed to the front of the managements objectives. You would think an institution like this,
Read More